Quadro T1000 vs P106-100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 is positioned at rank 90 and the P106-100 is on rank 43, so the P106-100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

94%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

92%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

91%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

89%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

88%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

86%

#75

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

909%

#90

Quadro T1000

MSRP: $400|Avg: $425

100%

#93

Radeon Pro 580

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

95%

#94

T1000 8GB

MSRP: $500|Avg: $380

94%

#99

Quadro K620

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

91%

#100

Tesla K20Xm

MSRP: $7699|Avg: N/A

90%

#105

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar P106-100

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

93%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

93%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

93%

#28

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

499%

#43

P106-100

MSRP: $224|Avg: $30

100%

#48

Quadro K3100M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $400

96%

#50

Quadro K5000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $509

95%

#51

Radeon PRO W6300

MSRP: $200|Avg: $150

94%

#52

Quadro K4100M

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $261

94%

#58

Quadro K2000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro T1000 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T1000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The P106-100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The P106-100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1000.

Insight	Quadro T1000	P106-100
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (250mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The P106-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $425 for the Quadro T1000, it costs 93% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1343.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro T1000	P106-100
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1343.5%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($425)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro T1000 Benchmark Check

P106-100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 and P106-100

Quadro T1000

The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

P106-100

The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the P106-100 reaches 6,628 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the P106-100 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

Feature	Quadro T1000	P106-100
G3D Mark Score	6,505	6,628+2%
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Boost Clock	1455 MHz	1733 MHz+19%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T1000	P106-100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro T1000	P106-100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12_1 (P106-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro T1000	P106-100
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 3rd Gen.

Feature	Quadro T1000	P106-100
Encoder	5th Gen NVENC (Turing)	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	4th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the P106-100's 75W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (P106-100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 156mm vs 250mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Quadro T1000	P106-100
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	156mm	250mm
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	130.1+47%	88.4

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro T1000 launched at $400 MSRP and currently averages $425, while the P106-100 launched at $224 and now averages $30. The P106-100 costs 92.9% less ($395 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 220.9 (P106-100) — the P106-100 offers 1343.8% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).