Quadro T1000 vs Quadro P3000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1000 is positioned at rank 90 and the Quadro P3000 is on rank 135, so the Quadro T1000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

94%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

92%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

91%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

89%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

88%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

86%

#75

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

909%

#90

Quadro T1000

MSRP: $400|Avg: $425

100%

#93

Radeon Pro 580

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

95%

#94

T1000 8GB

MSRP: $500|Avg: $380

94%

#99

Quadro K620

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

91%

#100

Tesla K20Xm

MSRP: $7699|Avg: N/A

90%

#105

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

97%

#120

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1388%

#135

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

100%

#136

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

100%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

94%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

94%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

93%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

93%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

92%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

91%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

90%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

89%

#147

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

89%

#148

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

87%

#149

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro T1000 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T1000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P3000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro T1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P3000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro T1000	Quadro P3000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro P3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $425 for the Quadro T1000, it costs 81% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 421.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro T1000	Quadro P3000
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+421.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($425)	✅More affordable ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro T1000 Benchmark Check

Quadro P3000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 and Quadro P3000

Quadro T1000

The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the Quadro P3000 reaches 6,384 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the Quadro P3000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

Feature	Quadro T1000	Quadro P3000
G3D Mark Score	6,505+2%	6,384
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Boost Clock	1455 MHz	1645 MHz+13%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T1000	Quadro P3000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro T1000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3000 has 6 GB. The Quadro P3000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	Quadro T1000	Quadro P3000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro T1000	Quadro P3000
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000).

Feature	Quadro T1000	Quadro P3000
Encoder	5th Gen NVENC (Turing)	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	4th Gen NVDEC	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the Quadro P3000's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (Quadro P3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro T1000	Quadro P3000
TDP	50W-80%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	156mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	65°C-19%	80°C
Perf/Watt	130.1+410%	25.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro T1000 launched at $400 MSRP and currently averages $425, while the Quadro P3000 launched at $600 and now averages $80. The Quadro P3000 costs 81.2% less ($345 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 79.8 (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 offers 421.6% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).