Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1060

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

2024Boost: 2050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1060 Performance Spectrum

Arc Graphics 140V
Shared 15
5,168
0.0%
brand logoArc 8-Core iGPU
brand logoArc Graphics 130V
brand logoArc 7-Cores iGPU
brand logoArc B570
GeForce GTX 1060
6 GB 180
10,064
+94.7%
brand logoGeForce GTX 680
brand logoGeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce GTX 980 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 140V

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Arc Graphics 140V is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Xe² (2024) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,168 vs 10,064).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    40.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $350 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅+94.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 173.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 94.7% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 5,168), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 140V is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 3nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $350, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 173.7% (40.4 vs 14.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1060 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Arc Graphics 140V has the stronger long-term case.

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 94.7%. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 3 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
5,168
10,064+95%
Architecture
Xe²
Pascal
Process Node
3 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
8
2560+31900%
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+18%
1733 MHz
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc Graphics 140V leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140V and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
Shared
6 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
192 GB/s
Bus Width
System
192-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
12.2+2%
12
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 169.2% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1060
TDP
15W-92%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
Integrated
6-pin
Length
0mm
173mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
—
Perf/Watt
344.5+516%
55.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 140V came in at $350, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 28.9% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 173% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140V (2024 vs 2016).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$350
$249-29%
Performance per Dollar
14.8
40.4+173%
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
GP104
Release
September 24 2024
May 27 2016
Ranking
#434
#137
Search Arc Graphics 140V on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 1060 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.