Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1060
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank #308 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 94.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (6 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-94.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+94.7%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 80% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 873.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+873.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and GeForce GTX 1060
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 94.7%. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 3 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168 | 10,064+95% |
| Architecture | Xe² | Pascal |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 2560+31900% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+18% | 1733 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 169.2% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-92% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 173mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+516% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 80% less ($240 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 875% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $249-29% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $60-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2 | 167.7+875% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | GP104 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #434 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140V and GeForce GTX 1060
