Arc Graphics 140V
VS
GeForce RTX 2060

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce RTX 2060

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

2024Boost: 2050 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

2019Core: 1365 MHzBoost: 1680 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank #308 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V

#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
95%
#298
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
735%
#300
666%
#301
665%
#305
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
604%
#306
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
600%
#308
Arc Graphics 140V
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
100%
#309
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
99%
#312
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
96%
#314
GeForce GT 720A
MSRP: $40|Avg: $40
96%
#315
GeForce MX110
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
96%
#320
GeForce 940A
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
94%
#323
Radeon RX 640
MSRP: $159|Avg: $55
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 173.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (6 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.

InsightArc Graphics 140VGeForce RTX 2060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-173.1%)
Leading raw performance (+173.1%)
Longevity
Xe² (2024) (3nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 582.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightArc Graphics 140VGeForce RTX 2060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+582.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and GeForce RTX 2060

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 173.1%. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 3 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1680 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce RTX 2060
G3D Mark Score
5,168
14,114+173%
Architecture
Xe²
Turing
Process Node
3 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
8
1920+23900%
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+22%
1680 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce RTX 2060
Upscaling Tech
XeSS
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce RTX 2060
VRAM Capacity
Shared
6 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
System
336 GB/s
Bus Width
System
192-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce RTX 2060
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce RTX 2060
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC (Turing)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 165.7% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 72.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce RTX 2060
TDP
15W-91%
160W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
Integrated
8-pin
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
113mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
72-15%
Perf/Watt
344.5+291%
88.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 60% less ($180 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 583.7% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce RTX 2060
MSRP
$350
$349
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$120-60%
Performance per Dollar
17.2
117.6+584%
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
TU106
Release
September 24 2024
January 7 2019
Ranking
#434
#168