Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce RTX 4060
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank #308 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 278.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-278.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+278.3%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $299 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 0% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 279.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+279.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and GeForce RTX 4060
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 278.3%. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 3 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168 | 19,548+278% |
| Architecture | Xe² | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 3072+38300% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz | 2460 MHz+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc Graphics 140V lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 153.8% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-87% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 73°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+103% | 170.0 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 0.3% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 280.2% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $299-15% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2 | 65.4+280% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | AD107 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #434 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140V and GeForce RTX 4060
