Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce RTX 4070
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank #308 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 420.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (12 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-420.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+420.9%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $550 (vs $300), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 184.1% better value per dollar than the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+184.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and GeForce RTX 4070
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 420.9%. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 3 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168 | 26,919+421% |
| Architecture | Xe² | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 5888+73500% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz | 2475 MHz+21% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc Graphics 140V lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 172.1% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 304mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 304mm |
| Height | 0mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+156% | 134.6 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The Arc Graphics 140V costs 45.5% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 184.3% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-42% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-45% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2 | 48.9+184% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | AD104 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #434 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140V and GeForce RTX 4070
