EPYC 75F3 vs Core Ultra 9 285K
EPYC 75F3
Core Ultra 9 285K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 75F3
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 75F3 | Core Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,799) | ✅ More affordable ($550) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 75F3 | Core Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+432%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,799) | ✅ More affordable ($550) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 75F3 and Core Ultra 9 285K
EPYC 75F3
The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.
Core Ultra 9 285K
The Core Ultra 9 285K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 67,482 points. Launch price was $589.
Processing Power
The EPYC 75F3 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 285K offers 24 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 5.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285K — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285K (base: 2.95 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Core Ultra 9 285K uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the Core Ultra 9 285K's 67,482 — a 4.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285K. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285K.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | Core Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5.6 GHz+40% |
| Base Clock | 2.95 GHz | 3.7 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+611% | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+500% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 64,505 | 67,482+5% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 45,563 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 22,563 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285K uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285K — the EPYC 75F3 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 75F3) vs 2 (Core Ultra 9 285K). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 75F3) vs 24 (Core Ultra 9 285K) — the EPYC 75F3 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and Z890 (Core Ultra 9 285K).
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | Core Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 192 GB+4915100% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 9 285K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 75F3) vs true (Core Ultra 9 285K). The Core Ultra 9 285K includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 64EU), while the EPYC 75F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Core Ultra 9 285K rivals Ryzen 9 9950X.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | Core Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel Arc Graphics 64EU |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 75F3 launched at $5383 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 9 285K debuted at $589. At current prices ($2799 vs $550), the Core Ultra 9 285K is $2249 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 23.0 pts/$ vs 122.7 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 9 285K — making the Core Ultra 9 285K the 136.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 75F3 | Core Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5383 | $589-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2799 | $550-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.0 | 122.7+433% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 75F3 and Core Ultra 9 285K
