EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ryzen 9 5900X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅+25.4% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.2 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌52.4% higher power demand at 160W vs 105W.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $306 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 160W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 48,869).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC Embedded 8224P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC Embedded 8224P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than EPYC Embedded 8224P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC Embedded 8224P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5900X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the stronger fit. You are getting 25.4% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 9 5900X comes in $306 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $855 MSRP, and it still gives you a 28.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC Embedded 8224P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 25.4% better PassMark. It is also 24.1% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 57.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC Embedded 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of AM4, more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 12/24, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC Embedded 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 2.55 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 48,869 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 22.6% lead for the EPYC Embedded 8224P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+100%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.8 GHz+60%
Base Clock	2.55 GHz	3.7 GHz+45%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	64 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	5 nm-29%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	48,869+25%	38,955
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	21,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,888

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC Embedded 8224P supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 800% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket	SP6	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+50%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	1152 GB+800%	128 GB
RAM Channels	6+200%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+300%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC Embedded 8224P was priced at $855, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($855 vs $549), Ryzen 9 5900X was $306 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC Embedded 8224P delivers 57.2 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 21.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP	$855	$549-36%
Performance per Dollar	57.2	71.0+24%
Release Date	2023	2020

Search EPYC Embedded 8224P on Amazon

Search Ryzen 9 5900X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.