EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon W-3345

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon W-3345 Performance Spectrum

EPYC Embedded 8224P

24 / 48

48,869

+1.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon W-3345

24 / 48

48,140

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon W-3345 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon W-3345: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Costs $1,644 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 196.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.2 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3345 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon W-3345

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (48,140 vs 48,869).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC Embedded 8224P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC Embedded 8224P better than Xeon W-3345?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3345 is ahead with a 9.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark. EPYC Embedded 8224P also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC Embedded 8224P is the better buy right now. EPYC Embedded 8224P comes in $1,644 cheaper on MSRP at $855 MSRP versus $2,499 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W-3345 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 196.7% better value on MSRP (57.2 vs 19.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC Embedded 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Xeon W-3345 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3345

The Xeon W-3345 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,140 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC Embedded 8224P and Xeon W-3345 share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3345 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3345 (base: 2.55 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3345 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 48,869 against the Xeon W-3345's 48,140 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC Embedded 8224P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3345.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon W-3345
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4 GHz+33%
Base Clock	2.55 GHz	3 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+78%	36 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	48,869+2%	48,140

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3345 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3345 — the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3345 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 8 (Xeon W-3345). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 128 (Xeon W-3345) — the Xeon W-3345 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) and SP3,C621A (Xeon W-3345).

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon W-3345
Socket	SP6	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+50%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	1152	4096+256%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96	128+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3345). Direct competitor: EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon W-3345 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon W-3345
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC Embedded 8224P was priced at $855, while the Xeon W-3345 came in at $2499. On launch pricing ($855 vs $2499), EPYC Embedded 8224P was $1644 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC Embedded 8224P delivers 57.2 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3345 — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 99.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC Embedded 8224P	Xeon W-3345
MSRP	$855-66%	$2499
Performance per Dollar	57.2+196%	19.3
Release Date	2023	2021

Search EPYC Embedded 8224P on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3345 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.