GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Arc A370M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

210

5,200

+1.7%

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (móvel)

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Arc A370M

35

5,115

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A370M

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

88%

#201

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

422%

#203

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

383%

#204

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

382%

#208

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

347%

#209

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

345%

#211

Arc A370M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#212

GeForce GTX 780M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

100%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

95%

#221

Radeon HD 6550A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

92%

#222

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

91%

#224

GeForce GT 640M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc A370M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2011). The Arc A370M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A370M.

Insight	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Arc A370M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Benchmark Check

Arc A370M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Arc A370M

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the Arc A370M reaches 5,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Arc A370M uses Generation 12.7, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1,024 (Arc A370M). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Arc A370M
G3D Mark Score	5,200+2%	5,115
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Generation 12.7
Process Node	40 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	448	1024+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.312 TFLOPS	3.174 TFLOPS+142%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1.5 MB+70%
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	4 MB+535%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Arc A370M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	XeSS
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) — a 39.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448. Bus width: 320-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 4 MB (Arc A370M) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Arc A370M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	156 GB/s+39%	112 GB/s
Bus Width	320-bit+400%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	4 MB+535%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Arc A370M
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12 Ultimate
OpenGL	4.2	4.6+10%
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Arc A370M
Encoder	UVD 4.0	Xe Media Engine
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	Xe Media Engine
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the Arc A370M's 35W — a 142.9% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (Arc A370M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 76°C vs 90.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Arc A370M
TDP	210W	35W-83%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	76°C-16%	90
Perf/Watt	24.8	146.1+489%