G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
16.1% HIGHER MSRP
$289 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅109.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 124.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 109.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 93.5% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 5,200), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $289, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 124.6% (40.4 vs 18.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 93.5%. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score	5,200	10,064+94%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	448	2560+471%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.312 TFLOPS	8.873 TFLOPS+576%
ROPs	40	64+60%
TMUs	56	160+186%
L1 Cache	896 KB	960 KB+7%
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	2 MB+217%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 23.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	156 GB/s	192 GB/s+23%
Bus Width	320-bit+67%	192-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	2 MB+217%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1060
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.2	4.5+7%
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1060
Encoder	UVD 4.0	NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 15.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1060
TDP	210W	180W-14%
Recommended PSU	550W	400W-27%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	6-pin
Length	267mm	173mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	76°C	—
Perf/Watt	24.8	55.9+125%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 13.8% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 124.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1060
MSRP	$289	$249-14%
Performance per Dollar	18.0	40.4+124%
Codename	GF110	GP104
Release	November 29 2011	May 27 2016
Ranking	#571	#137

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1060 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.