GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1650

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011Core: 732 MHz

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

4 GB 210

5,200

0.0%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB 75

7,869

+51.3%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
94% HIGHER MSRP
$289 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌180% higher power demand at 210W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅34.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 193.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 210W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 34.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 51.3% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 5,200), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $140 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $289, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 193.5% (52.8 vs 18.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 51.3%. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	5,200	7,869+51%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Turing
Process Node	40 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	448	896+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.312 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+127%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	56	56
L1 Cache	896 KB	896 KB
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 21.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	156 GB/s+22%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	320-bit+150%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.2	4.6+10%
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	UVD 4.0	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 94.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 76°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	210W	75W-64%
Recommended PSU	550W	300W-45%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	None
Length	267mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	76°C	70°C-8%
Perf/Watt	24.8	104.9+323%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 48.4% cheaper ($140 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 193.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP	$289	$149-48%
Performance per Dollar	18.0	52.8+193%
Codename	GF110	TU117
Release	November 29 2011	April 23 2019
Ranking	#571	#323

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.