G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅228.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 182.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 228.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 290.6% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 5,200), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, and 38 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $110 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $289, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 182.9% (50.9 vs 18.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 290.6%. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	5,200	20,312+291%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	40 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	448	4864+986%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.312 TFLOPS	16.2 TFLOPS+1135%
ROPs	40	80+100%
TMUs	56	152+171%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	4.8 MB+445%
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	4 MB+535%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 187.2% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	156 GB/s	448 GB/s+187%
Bus Width	320-bit+25%	256-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	4 MB+535%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL	4.2	4.6+10%
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Encoder	UVD 4.0	NVENC (Ampere)
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	NVDEC (Ampere)
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 4.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 76°C vs 75.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP	210W	200W-5%
Recommended PSU	550W-8%	600W
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	8-pin
Length	267mm	242mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	76°C	75-1%
Perf/Watt	24.8	101.6+310%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 was 27.6% cheaper ($110 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 182.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP	$289-28%	$399
Performance per Dollar	18.0	50.9+183%
Codename	GF110	GA104
Release	November 29 2011	December 1 2020
Ranking	#571	#73

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.