GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 3070

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011Core: 732 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3070

2020Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1725 MHz
RTX family
·······

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 3070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 3070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $210 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

  • 254.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 146.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 254.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 326.4% in PassMark G3D (22,172 vs 5,200), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $210 more expensive on MSRP at $499 vs $289, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 146.9% (44.4 vs 18.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 326.4%. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 3070
G3D Mark Score
5,200
22,172+326%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Ampere
Process Node
40 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
448
5888+1214%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.312 TFLOPS
20.31 TFLOPS+1448%
ROPs
40
96+140%
TMUs
56
184+229%
L1 Cache
0.88 MB
5.8 MB+559%
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
4 MB+535%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 3070
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 187.2% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 3070
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
156 GB/s
448 GB/s+187%
Bus Width
320-bit+25%
256-bit
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
4 MB+535%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 3070
DirectX
12 (FL 11_0)
12 Ultimate
OpenGL
4.2
4.6+10%
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 3070
Encoder
UVD 4.0
NVENC 7th gen
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 4.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 76°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 3070
TDP
210W-5%
220W
Recommended PSU
550W-15%
650W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
8-pin
Length
267mm
242mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
76°C
75°C-1%
Perf/Watt
24.8
100.8+306%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 was 42.1% cheaper ($210 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 146.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP
$289-42%
$499
Performance per Dollar
18.0
44.4+147%
Codename
GF110
GA104
Release
November 29 2011
September 1 2020
Ranking
#571
#63

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.