Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 4060

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011Core: 732 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
4 GB 210
5,200
0.0%
brand logoGeForce MX350
brand logoGeForce GTX 960A
brand logoGeForce GTX 660
brand logoGeForce MX550
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB 115
19,548
+275.9%
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 8GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 4060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
low67 FPS
medium58 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra29 FPS
1080P
GeForce RTX 4060
low167 FPS
medium152 FPS
high134 FPS
ultra115 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
low83 FPS
medium63 FPS
high52 FPS
ultra39 FPS
1080P
GeForce RTX 4060
low392 FPS
medium334 FPS
high268 FPS
ultra211 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
low234 FPS
medium187 FPS
high156 FPS
ultra117 FPS
1080P
GeForce RTX 4060
low812 FPS
medium642 FPS
high551 FPS
ultra440 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
low133 FPS
medium106 FPS
high92 FPS
ultra77 FPS
1080P
GeForce RTX 4060
low746 FPS
medium613 FPS
high536 FPS
ultra440 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
GeForce RTX 4060
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
low125 FPS
medium105 FPS
high85 FPS
ultra66 FPS
1080P
GeForce RTX 4060
low254 FPS
medium230 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra193 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
low70 FPS
medium53 FPS
high43 FPS
ultra31 FPS
1080P
GeForce RTX 4060
low195 FPS
medium154 FPS
high131 FPS
ultra96 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
low49 FPS
medium34 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra20 FPS
1080P
GeForce RTX 4060
low178 FPS
medium150 FPS
high130 FPS
ultra104 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
low77 FPS
medium60 FPS
high47 FPS
ultra33 FPS
1080P
GeForce RTX 4060
low177 FPS
medium160 FPS
high132 FPS
ultra112 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
low71 FPS
medium54 FPS
high42 FPS
ultra30 FPS
1080P
GeForce RTX 4060
low168 FPS
medium147 FPS
high133 FPS
ultra116 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 4060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅187.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅Delivers 263.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
  • ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 187.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 275.9% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 5,200), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 more expensive on MSRP at $299 vs $289, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 263.4% (65.4 vs 18.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 275.9%. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 4060
G3D Mark Score
5,200
19,548+276%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
40 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
448
3072+586%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.312 TFLOPS
15.11 TFLOPS+1052%
ROPs
40
48+20%
TMUs
56
96+71%
L1 Cache
0.88 MB
3 MB+241%
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
24 MB+3710%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 4060
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 74.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 4060
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
156 GB/s
272 GB/s+74%
Bus Width
320-bit+150%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
24 MB+3710%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 4060
DirectX
12 (FL 11_0)
12 Ultimate
OpenGL
4.2
4.6+10%
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 4060
Encoder
UVD 4.0
NVENC 8th gen
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 58.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 76°C vs 73°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 4060
TDP
210W
115W-45%
Recommended PSU
550W
550W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
8-pin
Length
267mm
240mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
76°C
73°C-4%
Perf/Watt
24.8
170.0+585%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 was 3.3% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 263.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP
$289-3%
$299
Performance per Dollar
18.0
65.4+263%
Codename
GF110
AD107
Release
November 29 2011
May 18 2023
Ranking
#571
#84
Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on AmazonSearch GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.