GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $310 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅271.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 149.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 417.7%. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,200 | 26,919+418% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 5888+1214% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.312 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+2122% |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 56 | 184+229% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 5.8 MB+559% |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 36 MB+5614% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 223.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 156 GB/s | 504 GB/s+223% |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+67% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 36 MB+5614% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12.2+2% |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 4.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 76°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W | 200W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 76°C-5% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 24.8 | 134.6+443% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 was 51.8% cheaper ($310 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 149.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-52% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0 | 44.9+149% |
| Codename | GF110 | AD104 |
| Release | November 29 2011 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #571 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and GeForce RTX 4070
