
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Tesla K8
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Tesla K8 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Tesla K8 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Tesla K8: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $711 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 252% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌110% higher power demand at 210W vs 100W.
Tesla K8
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 210W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌246% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Tesla K8 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

Tesla K8
The Tesla K8 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 16 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 693 MHz to 811 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,111 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the Tesla K8 reaches 5,111 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Tesla K8 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1,536 (Tesla K8). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2.491 TFLOPS (Tesla K8).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,200+2% | 5,111 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 1536+243% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.312 TFLOPS | 2.491 TFLOPS+90% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 128+129% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+600% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla K8 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 128-bit on the Tesla K8. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 512 KB (Tesla K8) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+150% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the Tesla K8's 100W — a 71% difference. The Tesla K8 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (Tesla K8). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W | 100W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 76°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.8 | 51.1+106% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the Tesla K8 launched at $1000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 was 71.1% cheaper ($711 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 5.1 (Tesla K8) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 252.9% better value. The newer card here is Tesla K8 (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-71% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0+253% | 5.1 |
| Codename | GF110 | GK104 |
| Release | November 29 2011 | September 16 2014 |
| Ranking | #571 | #515 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















