GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Tesla K8
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Popular choices:
Tesla K8
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K8
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K8.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $100), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 239.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+239.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Tesla K8
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.
Tesla K8
The Tesla K8 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 16 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 693 MHz to 811 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,111 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the Tesla K8 reaches 5,111 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Tesla K8 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1,536 (Tesla K8). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2.491 TFLOPS (Tesla K8).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,200+2% | 5,111 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 1536+243% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.312 TFLOPS | 2.491 TFLOPS+90% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 128+129% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+600% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 320-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 512 KB (Tesla K8) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+150% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the Tesla K8's 100W — a 71% difference. The Tesla K8 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (Tesla K8). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W | 100W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 76°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.8 | 51.1+106% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Tesla K8 launched at $1000 and now averages $100. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 70% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 51.1 (Tesla K8) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 239.1% better value. The Tesla K8 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-71% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-70% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 173.3+239% | 51.1 |
| Codename | GF110 | GK104 |
| Release | November 29 2011 | September 16 2014 |
| Ranking | #571 | #515 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Tesla K8
