Quadro T1000 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro T1000 is positioned at rank #90 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

94%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

92%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

91%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

89%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

88%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

86%

#75

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

909%

#90

Quadro T1000

MSRP: $400|Avg: $425

100%

#93

Radeon Pro 580

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

95%

#94

T1000 8GB

MSRP: $500|Avg: $380

94%

#99

Quadro K620

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

91%

#100

Tesla K20Xm

MSRP: $7699|Avg: N/A

90%

#105

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 21% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1000.

Insight	Quadro T1000	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-21%)	✅Leading raw performance (+21%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $425 for the Quadro T1000, it costs 82% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 585.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro T1000	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+585.5%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($425)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro T1000 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 and GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro T1000

The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 21%. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Quadro T1000	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	6,505	7,869+21%
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Boost Clock	1455 MHz	1665 MHz+14%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T1000	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro T1000	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro T1000	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Quadro T1000	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	5th Gen NVENC (Turing)	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	4th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 156mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Quadro T1000	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	156mm	229mm
Height	69mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	65°C-7%	70°C
Perf/Watt	130.1+24%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro T1000 launched at $400 MSRP and currently averages $425, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 82.4% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 585.6% better value.