GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs FirePro W7100

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011Core: 732 MHz

FirePro W7100

2014Core: 920 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

210

5,200

+2.7%

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (móvel)

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

FirePro W7100

150

5,065

0.0%

Radeon HD 6970

Radeon HD8970M

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7100

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

99%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

97%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

96%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

95%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

92%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

88%

#169

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2330%

#184

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

100%

#185

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

100%

#186

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

99%

#188

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

98%

#190

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

97%

#191

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

97%

#193

FirePro M6000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

96%

#196

FirePro M4170

MSRP: $200|Avg: $80

92%

#197

GRID K140Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $500

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W7100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	FirePro W7100
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $114), it costs 74% less, resulting in a 290.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	FirePro W7100
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+290.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($30)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($114)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Benchmark Check

FirePro W7100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and FirePro W7100

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

FirePro W7100

The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the FirePro W7100 reaches 5,065 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the FirePro W7100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1,792 (FirePro W7100). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	FirePro W7100
G3D Mark Score	5,200+3%	5,065
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448	1792+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.312 TFLOPS	3.297 TFLOPS+151%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	56	112+100%
L1 Cache	896 KB+100%	448 KB
L2 Cache	640 KB+25%	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	FirePro W7100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W7100 has 8 GB. The FirePro W7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 320-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 512 KB (FirePro W7100) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	FirePro W7100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	320-bit+150%	128-bit
L2 Cache	640 KB+25%	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	FirePro W7100
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.2	4.6+10%
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	FirePro W7100
Encoder	UVD 4.0	VCE 3.0
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	UVD 5.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the FirePro W7100's 150W — a 33.3% difference. The FirePro W7100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (FirePro W7100). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 76°C vs 95.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	FirePro W7100
TDP	210W	150W-29%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	241mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	76°C-20%	95
Perf/Watt	24.8	33.8+36%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro W7100 launched at $799 and now averages $114. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 73.7% less ($84 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 44.4 (FirePro W7100) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 290.3% better value. The FirePro W7100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).