NVS 510
VS
Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual

NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual

NVS 510

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual

2013Core: 720 / 825 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 510 is positioned at rank 321 and the Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual is on rank 665, so the NVS 510 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 510

#306
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9783%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
100%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
98%
#323
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
94%
#324
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
94%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
92%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
91%
#327
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
91%
#328
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
91%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
88%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
86%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
85%
#332
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
85%
#334
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
84%
#335
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
84%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual

#655
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
6540%
#657
5929%
#658
5913%
#662
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
5377%
#663
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
5340%
#665
Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#666
Mobility Radeon 4100
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
99%
#667
Radeon HD 2900 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
99%
#668
GeForce 9700M GT
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
99%
#669
GeForce 9300 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#670
Mobility Radeon X2500
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#671
GeForce 9800M GTX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $30
91%
#672
Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $57
91%
#673
90%
#674
GeForce 505
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
87%
#675
GeForce 9200M GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
87%
#676
Mobility Radeon. HD 5470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
86%
#677
Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $40
86%
#678
GeForce 7500 LE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
86%
#679
GeForce 9650M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
83%
#680
GeForce 9650M GS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The NVS 510 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual.

InsightNVS 510Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The NVS 510 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the NVS 510 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $400), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2630.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightNVS 510Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2630.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of NVS 510 and Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual

NVIDIA

NVS 510

The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual

The Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 664 points.

Graphics Performance

The NVS 510 scores 680 and the Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual reaches 664 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 512 (NVS 510) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual).

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
G3D Mark Score
680+2%
664
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512 ×2
640+25%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The NVS 510 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual has 512 MB. The NVS 510 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 510 draws 68W versus the Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual's 50W — a 30.5% difference. The Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 510) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
TDP
68W
50W-26%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
160mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
10.0
13.3+33%
💰

Value Analysis

The NVS 510 launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual launched at $400 and now averages $400. The NVS 510 costs 96.3% less ($385 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.3 (NVS 510) vs 1.7 (Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual) — the NVS 510 offers 2564.7% better value. The NVS 510 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
MSRP
$449
$400-11%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-96%
$400
Performance per Dollar
45.3+2565%
1.7
Codename
GM107
Release
November 4 2015
August 1 2013
Ranking
#826
#863