Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R9 M265X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R9 M265X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R9 M265X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 33.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M265X

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 M265X is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
33.3% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (1,172 vs 1,167), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 M265X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 33.9% (7.8 vs 5.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R9 M265X has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R9 M265X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Radeon R9 M265X

The Radeon R9 M265X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the Radeon R9 M265X reaches 1,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the Radeon R9 M265X uses GCN 1.0, both on 22 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M265X). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M265X). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 625 MHz.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon R9 M265X
G3D Mark Score	1,172	1,167
Architecture	Generation 7.5	GCN 1.0
Process Node	22 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	640+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS	0.8 TFLOPS+4%
Boost Clock	1200 MHz+92%	625 MHz
ROPs	4	16+300%
TMUs	40	40

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon R9 M265X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M265X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M265X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M265X.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon R9 M265X
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M265X's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M265X). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon R9 M265X
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	Mobile
Perf/Watt	39.1+151%	15.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 came in at $150, while the Radeon R9 M265X launched at $200. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 was 25% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 M265X) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 34.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M265X (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP	$150-25%	$200
Performance per Dollar	7.8+34%	5.8
Codename	Haswell GT3e	Venus
Release	May 27 2013	March 21 2014
Ranking	#835	#839

Search Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M265X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.