Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.
Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
2020Why buy it
- ✅Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
The Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2020. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 2100 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,166 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C reaches 1,166 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C uses Vega, both on 22 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 512 (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,166 |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Vega |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 512+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 2100 MHz+75% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and System on the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 15W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 77.7+99% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 came in at $150, while the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C launched at $150. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 7.8 (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C) — the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | Vega |
| Release | May 27 2013 | January 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #835 | #545 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
