Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is positioned at rank 403 and the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C is on rank 406, so the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Generation 7.5 (2013)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Vega (2017−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 25.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+25.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
The Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2020. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 2100 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,166 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C reaches 1,166 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C uses Vega, both on 22 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 512 (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,166 |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Vega |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 512+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 2100 MHz+75% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 15W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 77.7+99% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C launched at $150 and now averages $50. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.3 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 23.3 (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 25.8% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-20% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3+26% | 23.3 |
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | Vega |
| Release | May 27 2013 | January 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #835 | #545 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C
